think the idea is very interesting. Crudely analyze the passivity of mass atrocity against this consent. Also obliquely addresses the relationship prisoner / a-keeper / a characteristic of many prisons and other similar venues. Do not forget to think about the selfishness and altruism in extreme situations as in this concentration camp would seem that in cases like the present one change compared a moment of "freedom" . I read it in three days (two if we did not read the second) but it may heERSE in one. It is agile and entertaining. However, in my view, has certain shortcomings importanets. For example, relatives of those imprisoned are absent throughout the play. The ending is somewhat hit and loose compared to the pace of the rest of the work. And above all, the idea aims high and stays in the middle, with the feeling of disappointment. The latter may lead to even think that the author seeks fair that criticizes the illness at any price. Nevertheless it is a book recommended to hang such an afternoon in which to take a minimally dense book is unthinkable. you really could get to be a situation like quand sets the book? Number of pages: 166 best: taken to the extreme the idea of entertainment at any price and how / as viewers / as are all proposed to them without considering the morality of the matter in questions , not even being conscious but self-righteous for viewing.
Rating: 5 / 10
Rating: 5 / 10
0 comments:
Post a Comment